[arin-ppml] Clarify /29 assignment identification requirement

[William Herrin]

On 4/27/12, Jo Rhett <jrhett at netconsonance.com> wrote:
> I do not support this proposal. In fact this issue would bring me very
> actively out against it. In particular because it will effectively remove
> all validation of mobile phone, cable and dsl operators.

Jo,

Have you considered the double-standard in place here?

Where you specify a DHCP pool for always-on DSL users who may well
hold a particular address for months, ARIN does not consider itself at
liberty to inquire into the customers' identities and is able
"validate" the use regardless. Yet if you explicitly assign them
/32's...

Regards,
Bill Herrin


-- 
William D. Herrin ................ herrin at dirtside.com  bill at herrin.us
3005 Crane Dr. ...................... Web: <http://bill.herrin.us/>
Falls Church, VA 22042-3004