[arin-ppml] Clarify /29 assignment identification requirement

[Martin Hannigan]

Yes.


On Friday, April 27, 2012, Chris Grundemann wrote:

> On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 12:21, Jeffrey Lyon <jeffrey.lyon at blacklotus.net<javascript:;>>
> wrote:
>
> > My position is that any assignment of < /29 to a private individual
> > should be classifiable as "Private assignment" without further
> > discussion, so long as these assignments do not make up a majority of
> > the justification.
>
> To be clear: You would accept a justification in which 49% of the
> address space simply said "private assignments?"
>
> ~Chris
>
> > --
> > Jeffrey A. Lyon, CISSP
> > President | (757) 304-0668
> > http://www.blacklotus.net
> > Black Lotus Communications
> > _______________________________________________
> > PPML
> > You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
> > the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML at arin.net <javascript:;>).
> > Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
> > http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
> > Please contact info at arin.net <javascript:;> if you experience any
> issues.
>
>
>
> --
> @ChrisGrundemann
> http://chrisgrundemann.com
> _______________________________________________
> PPML
> You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
> the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML at arin.net <javascript:;>).
> Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
> http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
> Please contact info at arin.net <javascript:;> if you experience any issues.
>


-- 
Sent via a mobile device
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.arin.net/pipermail/arin-ppml/attachments/20120427/7c368e71/attachment.htm>