[arin-ppml] Revealing /32 customers?

[Owen DeLong]

On Apr 26, 2012, at 3:16 PM, John Curran wrote:

> On Apr 26, 2012, at 3:02 PM, William Herrin wrote:
>> 
>> I don't doubt it and I'm pleased to hear that ARIN is vigorously
>> defending the address pool. I just want to make sure that if we've
>> decided, as a matter of consensus based public policy, that
>> assignments smaller than /29 are permitted to remain a private matter
>> between ISP and customer that the staff procedures are not, in a
>> roundabout way, contradicting or partially nullifying that policy.
> 
> I do believe that the policy intent was to keep customer data private 
> _with respect to public reassignment directories_, and not with
> respect to answering ARIN inquiries regarding utilization, but I 
> could be mistaken.  The policy origin of the language is in ARIN 
> 2010-14 <https://www.arin.net/policy/proposals/2010_14.html>
> 
Let's be clear... That intent is limited to allocations/assignments /29
or longer and residential customers ONLY.

Others have no intent or expectation of privacy in NRPM.

Owen