[arin-ppml] ARIN-prop-157 Section 8.3 Simplification

Owen DeLong owen at delong.com
Wed Sep 21 17:56:50 EDT 2011

I disagree. While we did not feel it was appropriate to limit IPv4 transfers to
legacy space, the existence of legacy space really is the only reason we needed
an 8.3 transfer policy. Space covered by RSA should be returned to ARIN and
the recipient should get their space directly from ARIN without the need for
directed transfers.


On Sep 21, 2011, at 9:01 AM, Matthew Kaufman wrote:

> Support. There is no reason for IPv4 to be special here. As IPv6 becomes more prevalent, we will undoubtedly see cases where someone wants to transfer a block of IPv4 space *and* the associated IPv6 space without selling a portion of their business along with it.
> Matthew Kaufman
> _______________________________________________
> You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
> the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML at arin.net).
> Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
> http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
> Please contact info at arin.net if you experience any issues.

More information about the ARIN-PPML mailing list