[arin-ppml] ARIN-prop-157 Section 8.3 Simplification
bill at telnetcommunications.com
Wed Sep 21 15:58:33 EDT 2011
I believe that the term "qualified" was meant to address this (Marty?),
however I agree that it is vague and could lead to interpretation issues.
Perhaps the wording could be tweaked a little to clarify.
On 11-09-21 12:42 PM, "McTim" <dogwallah at gmail.com> wrote:
>It seems that the needs requirement goes away with this simplification.
>if so, I am opposed.
>You can see my rationale for my position here:
>"A name indicates what we seek. An address indicates where it is. A
>route indicates how we get there." Jon Postel
>On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 7:21 PM, Randy Whitney
><randy.whitney at verizon.com> wrote:
>> On 9/21/2011 11:29 AM, ARIN wrote:
>>> ARIN-prop-157 Section 8.3 Simplification
>>> The original text was overly complex and imprecise. The modified
>>> language has been reduced to be clear with respect to allowing
>>> transfers of "number resources". The definition of "number resources"
>>> any IPv4 address or addresses, IPV6 address or addresses or a 2 byte or
>>> 4 byte ASN individually or collectively.
>>> Timetable for implementation: Immediate
>> You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
>> the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML at arin.net).
>> Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
>> Please contact info at arin.net if you experience any issues.
>You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
>the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML at arin.net).
>Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
>Please contact info at arin.net if you experience any issues.
More information about the ARIN-PPML