[arin-ppml] CGN multiplier was: RE: Input on an article by Geoff Huston (potentially/myopically off-topic addendum)

Owen DeLong owen at delong.com
Wed Sep 14 23:02:20 EDT 2011

>> Using NAT66 to enable at least one form of provider portability
>> that is commonly used today in the IPv4 world and that most
>> people are familiar with is an important step forward. Just
>> because IPv6 has more addresses, doesn't automatically fix the
>> provider portability issue.
> I agree with that statement; namely, easy renumbering still is an
> oxymoron. But RFC6296 is more than NAT66 and not enough to provide a
> working multihoming solution.

But the barrier to getting PI in IPv6 is so low that I really think PI is preferable
to NAT.


More information about the ARIN-PPML mailing list