[arin-ppml] CGN multiplier was: RE: Input on an article by Geoff Huston (potentially/myopically off-topic addendum)

Martin Hannigan hannigan at gmail.com
Wed Sep 14 16:27:26 EDT 2011

On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 12:30 PM, Chris Grundemann <cgrundemann at gmail.com>wrote:

> On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 09:53, Chris Engel <cengel at conxeo.com> wrote:
> <snip>
> > There may, indeed, be some or even many individual organizations that
> choose to adopt CGN as long term alternative solutions to IPv6. However, if
> they can make it work well for them and their community of users....what's
> so terribly wrong with that?  It may not have been the choice you
> preferred...but that's what it means to live in a free society...you don't
> get to make other peoples choices for them.
> Then why do you get to force me to continue to use a broken legacy
> protocol?
When did IPV6 become a broken legacy protocol?


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.arin.net/pipermail/arin-ppml/attachments/20110914/bff48d08/attachment-0001.html>

More information about the ARIN-PPML mailing list