[arin-ppml] An article of interest to the community....
owen at delong.com
Fri Sep 2 18:30:19 EDT 2011
>> I'd recommend that folks also use the number resource fraud reporting page to highlight possible issues, since there are more folks in the community than in ARIN staff.
> It would be inappropriate to report abandoned/un-/underutilized blocks as fraudulent prior to them being hijacked, since no fraud as yet been committed.
It is the best place to make such a report. That page really needs a new name.
Perhaps a "Resource policy violation report"?
> You appear to be stuck in a reactive mindset, i.e. only dealing with hijacking after it has occurred. What I discuss above is being proactive and initiating reviews on likely targets before they are hijacked.
> Compare this:
> abandoned block -> review -> reclaim
> with this:
> abandoned block -> hijack -> complaint -> review -> revoke
> IMHO, the latter exhibits better stewardship.
I think you mean the former. I certainly think it is better to review and reclaim before hijack.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the ARIN-PPML