[arin-ppml] An article of interest to the community....
mike at nationwideinc.com
Thu Sep 1 10:49:43 EDT 2011
>When STLS was being developed, the AC was very careful to specify that
>merely listing resources for sale on STLS or through another medium was
>not in itself to subject a resource holder to a section 12 review or any
>procedure for revocation. Neither, however, was such listing intended to
>provide a safe harbor against ARIN proceeding with any such action
>based on other independent data or investigation.
>In other words, while we don't want listing your addresses to flag you for
>an audit, we also don't want to create a situation where merely listing
>addresses gives you an exemption from policy.
In the real world, the real corporate world at least, the idea of every
workstation having a real public IP address went away more than a decade ago
for the most part.
Same thing in the residential world.
In fact, my guess is that you would only see such profligate use of IP
addresses in public or academic environments.
It's only a guess based on my experience, perhaps some more feedback is
As far as the idea of people returning address space to ARIN for community
purposes, how's that working out for ARIN?
You have merely restated the problem I elucidated with John.
You want to maintain the belief system that addresses are to be returned for
disuse per the RSA, and that enforcement of that is incorporated as a
section 12 review/revokation.
Yet 8.3 allows holders to sell addresses.
The conundrum of course is that in order to comply with policy, the seller
has to pretend to be using the addresses efficiently so as to preclude the
threat of section 12.
If the seller chooses to thus pretend in order to advertise his available
space, his lawyer, reading the RSA, is likely to advise him that he runs the
risk of losing that space to a section 12 review.
His shareholders, then, (even if it is one person holding the shares), will
advise not to advertise the addresses, instead to hold on and wait for
policy change, or else to process a transaction in the dark so as not to
engender the section 12 review.
Neither of these last options is desirable if we truly are seeking to bring
unused addresses into use and comply with the goals of conservation and
More information about the ARIN-PPML