[arin-ppml] CGN multiplier was: RE: Input on an article by Geoff Huston (potentially/myopically off-topic addendum)

[Owen DeLong]

> 
> 
>> Using NAT66 to enable at least one form of provider portability
>> that is commonly used today in the IPv4 world and that most
>> people are familiar with is an important step forward. Just
>> because IPv6 has more addresses, doesn't automatically fix the
>> provider portability issue.
> 
> I agree with that statement; namely, easy renumbering still is an
> oxymoron. But RFC6296 is more than NAT66 and not enough to provide a
> working multihoming solution.
> 

But the barrier to getting PI in IPv6 is so low that I really think PI is preferable
to NAT.

Owen