[arin-ppml] An article of interest to the community

Rudolph Daniel rudi.daniel at gmail.com
Fri Sep 2 17:22:45 EDT 2011


My sole point with this discussion, which seems to have gone off on a
tangent, is that ARIN is not and should not become (IMO) "The Society for
the Promotion of IPv6".  ARIN is the organization that is responsible for
number resources in this region..... and it should (IMO) pretty much be
neutral in how it approaches that responsibility in regards to IPv4, IPv6 or
IPv99. It shouldn't entertain the idea of making number resources of one
type harder to get then another in order to promote the other. Nor should it
act to reduce the amount of one type of resource available in THIS REGION in
order to promote the use of another variety.

>
> More specifically ARIN shouldn't entertain the notion of transferring IPv4
> resources that will be needed in THIS region out of the region simply
> because that is likely to reduce the available pool of IPv4 more quickly and
> thus spur the adoption of IPv6. That, IMO, would be an abdication of it's
> core responsibility.  If there is some other reason for allowing such
> transfers that DOES serve the interests of the community using IPv4 in this
> region, then great. That would be a legitimate rationale to support such
> policies...but astro-turfing IPv4 address space because maybe it'll help
> IPv6 growth isn't.
>
> Let IPv6 stand or fall on it's own merit. Make sure that there are no
> significant barriers in terms of Policy that would prevent people who want
> and have a legitimate need for IPv6 address space to obtain it (I think you
> guys already have that pretty much well in hand) but don't entertain the
> idea of standing behind folks with a cattle prod pushing them there if they
> think they are better served for the time being remaining on IPv4.
> Christopher Engel
>

Hi Chris
I was not aware that ARIN (per se) had become "The Society for the Promotion
of IPv6" but I am aware that the NRO on behalf of the RIRs did call for all
stakeholders to make IPv6 deployment a priority.
But as I listen carefully to the crosswinds, I say to myself that IPv4/IPv6
transition campaigners may well consider or need to find, a profit motive
sooner or later to entice a profit motivated industry to inspired action
instead of a transition categorized as simply, the right thing to do.
RD
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.arin.net/pipermail/arin-ppml/attachments/20110902/242149a1/attachment.html>


More information about the ARIN-PPML mailing list