[arin-ppml] 2011-1 dissent Was: Re: ARIN-2011-1: ARINInter-RIRTransfers - Last Call

Kevin Blumberg kevinb at thewire.ca
Wed Oct 26 18:53:01 EDT 2011


If that is the case I do not support the current text. 

I strongly support 2011-1 continue to be worked on but I feel that any needs assessment done from which ever
side does it is more closely related to that regions current policies. 

I believe that "compatible" should be replaced with a more consistent and defined criteria that matches a 
minimum agreeable needs based requirement for a transfer out of region.

Kevin Blumberg
T 416.214.9473 x31
F 416.862.9473
kevinb at thewire.ca

> -----Original Message-----
> From: John Curran [mailto:jcurran at arin.net]
> Sent: Wednesday, October 26, 2011 5:31 PM
> To: Kevin Blumberg
> Cc: Sweeting, John; Owen DeLong; William Herrin; arin-ppml at arin.net List
> Subject: Re: [arin-ppml] 2011-1 dissent Was: Re: ARIN-2011-1: ARINInter-
> RIRTransfers - Last Call
> On Oct 26, 2011, at 8:19 PM, Kevin Blumberg wrote:
> > If another region said that the minimum block they gave out for
> > initial allocation to a new multi homed entrant was a /18 based on a 10 year
> needs projection, would that be compatible?
> Yes.  If the policy requires the recipient to demonstrate their operational
> need for the address space to their RIR, then it is a compatible transfer policy
> for purposes of transfers going out of region.
> /John

More information about the ARIN-PPML mailing list