[arin-ppml] question about NRPM 'efficient utilization' criteria

Jimmy Hess mysidia at gmail.com
Sat Oct 15 15:23:46 EDT 2011

On Sat, Oct 15, 2011 at 11:23 AM, Owen DeLong <owen at delong.com> wrote:

Not that I am in favor of the change;  I would strongly prefer the
table option to still exist, and for the table to be restored, but
2010_14 was rather explicit

"Strike sections, and"

The table option for accounting for additional utilization was
specifically striken from the policy
by that particular change.

And now we have a situation that needs to be corrected, where we have
one policy referring to another policy that no longer exists.

> I don't think that's correct. I think the reference to the table governs and the table should be restored (with appropriate referential updates) to a more appropriate location.
> Owen


More information about the ARIN-PPML mailing list