[arin-ppml] question about NRPM 'efficient utilization' criteria

Owen DeLong owen at delong.com
Sat Oct 15 12:23:55 EDT 2011

I don't think that's correct. I think the reference to the table governs and the table should be restored (with appropriate referential updates) to a more appropriate location.


Sent from my iPad

On Oct 14, 2011, at 21:17, Jimmy Hess <mysidia at gmail.com> wrote:

> On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 4:48 PM, Gary Buhrmaster
> <gary.buhrmaster at gmail.com> wrote:
>> The table was deleted by 2010-14 (you can see the original
>> format in the previous versions of the NRPM).  Clearly the references
>> should have been updated/removed.
> Oops... someone free()'d   the page the table was on,  but left a dangling
> pointer reference in the NRPM.
> I would call that a bug. :)
>> Previous version of the NRPM with the table:
>>  https://www.arin.net/policy/archive/nrpm_20110727.pdf
> If the table is gone...   the conclusion I would have is that the
> table is no longer
> allowed under the policy,   so it doesn't matter what the old version said,
> if it's no longer an allowed method.
> --
> -JH
> _______________________________________________
> You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
> the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML at arin.net).
> Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
> http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
> Please contact info at arin.net if you experience any issues.

More information about the ARIN-PPML mailing list