[arin-ppml] LRSA v3.0 . MWE revised 8-16-11 (Comment)

[John Curran]

On Oct 28, 2011, at 3:11 AM, Brett Frankenberger wrote:
> 
> (On the other hand, I think ARIN's intent -- as distinct from what I
> think is the effect of the currentlu proposed language -- is to not
> charge legacy holders more than similarly situated non-legacy holders
> under any circumstances.  If that's the case, then I'd suggest ARIN
> alter the wording to clarify that.)

Point taken. The intent is for comparable fees, not increases, 
and the contract language needs to be fixed accordingly.

Thanks!
/John

John Curran
President and CEO
ARIN