cja at daydream.com
Wed Nov 16 00:08:59 EST 2011
Shoot I pasted the wrong draft name. This is the draft that references that
special purpose block
I am having a horrible problem with jet lag here.
Anyway this seems to me to be another special purpose block that perhaps
could use the /10 in the Weil proposal instead?
If folks don't feel that this is something that relates to ppml that's
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 11:07 AM, David Farmer <farmer at umn.edu> wrote:
> I'm confused or you are.
> On 11/15/11 20:25 CST, CJ Aronson wrote:
>> Hi everyone..
>> I just heard a presentation of this Internet Draft
> That is an interesting draft discussing a problem set, but I don't see
> where it proposes any solutions to the problem, especially nothing using
> the address range you describe below.
> This is another proposal for a special purpose transition block.
>> Apparently the IANA has already reserved a block for this,
>> 220.127.116.11/24 <http://18.104.22.168/24>
> That address range is defined as a range "to be used in the context of
> generating an IPv4 source address for mapped ICMPv6 packets being passed
> through a stateless IPv4/IPv6 translator," in draft-xli-behave-icmp-address-
> I've personally followed this draft and it is interesting, however I don't
> see how they are related other than IPv4 ICMP in a tangential way.
> This is being discussed on the IETF IPv6 Operations mailing list
>> apparently. I wanted to bring it to your attention.
>> This draft seems to be to be directly related to work in our community.
> ?????? <perplexed>
> David Farmer Email:farmer at umn.edu
> Networking & Telecommunication Services
> Office of Information Technology
> University of Minnesota
> 2218 University Ave SE Phone: 612-626-0815
> Minneapolis, MN 55414-3029 Cell: 612-812-9952
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the ARIN-PPML