[arin-ppml] Petition draft 2011-1 last call
jcurran at arin.net
Tue Nov 8 09:00:30 EST 2011
On Nov 8, 2011, at 8:19 AM, "William Herrin" <bill at herrin.us> wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 8, 2011 at 7:00 AM, John Curran <jcurran at arin.net> wrote:
>> On Nov 8, 2011, at 6:29 AM, "William Herrin" <bill at herrin.us> wrote:
>>> On Tue, Nov 8, 2011 at 6:19 AM, John Curran <jcurran at arin.net> wrote:
>>>> If you wish to revert to an earlier version of 2011-1,
>>>> please note which version.
>>> Please explain how reverting to text that staff described as,
>>> "unclear, vague, and wide open for
>>> interpretation," adequately responds to the AC's actions of concern.
>> I specifically said "an earlier version", not the immediately
>> prior version. This addresses the potential situation where
>> may not be adequate opportunity to petition changes made
>> by the AC immediately prior to the Public Policy Meeting.
> Which previous version of draft 2011-1 do you believe contains
> language for which staff's criticism is not valid?
The page for Draft Policy 2011-1 <https://www.arin.net/policy/proposals/2011_1.html> contains links to all prior texts and assessments.
> Or do I misunderstand? Do you propose that 2011-1 should have been petitioned at the prior petition point when the sloppy language was
> first accepted onto the AC's docket even though the AC is supposed to
> address such errors in that discussion and development phase making
> such a petition premature?
I am not proposing that any petition should be made, only noting that petitioning to an earlier version is a reasonable and prudent mechanism which does not appear to conflict with the PDP petition process.
President and CEO
More information about the ARIN-PPML