[arin-ppml] ARIN-prop-153 Correct erroneous syntax in NRPM 8.3

Owen DeLong owen at delong.com
Tue May 31 19:25:57 EDT 2011

On May 31, 2011, at 4:00 PM, Matthew Kaufman wrote:

> On 5/31/2011 2:10 PM, Owen DeLong wrote:
>> While it is equally bad for router memory, the latter case is inevitable if the /24 needs of {B,C,D,E} are to be met, while meeting the /22 need of B can be accomplished without this impact. As such, allowing Org B to transfer 4 disjoint /24s rather than seek a /22, even if it costs them more per address or takes them longer has a negative impact on the rest of the community.
> How about instead we create a group of people whose job it is to review transfer requests before they are granted and let them use their own common sense?
> Matthew Kaufman

We have such a group. It's called "Registration Services". They have requested that the
community use policy to express our intent as to how common sense should be applied.

I believe that we owe it to them to honor that request.


More information about the ARIN-PPML mailing list