[arin-ppml] ARIN-prop-153 Correct erroneous syntax in NRPM 8.3

Matthew Kaufman matthew at matthew.at
Tue May 31 19:00:51 EDT 2011

On 5/31/2011 2:10 PM, Owen DeLong wrote:
> While it is equally bad for router memory, the latter case is inevitable if the /24 needs of {B,C,D,E} are to be met, while meeting the /22 need of B can be accomplished without this impact. As such, allowing Org B to transfer 4 disjoint /24s rather than seek a /22, even if it costs them more per address or takes them longer has a negative impact on the rest of the community.

How about instead we create a group of people whose job it is to review 
transfer requests before they are granted and let them use their own 
common sense?

Matthew Kaufman

More information about the ARIN-PPML mailing list