[arin-ppml] ARIN-prop-153 Correct erroneous syntax in NRPM 8.3

Frank Bulk frnkblk at iname.com
Mon May 30 00:34:33 EDT 2011

I'm confused.  If an organization can demonstrate need for a /14 and they
can only find a /15 in the market today, why should they have to wait a
whole year if they can find another /15 just a few months later?  Why should
we penalize them for the fact that the supply at the time of need is low?
Is it because you want someone else with demonstrable need to get that
second /15?  If that's the case, won't that be based on who's willing to pay
top dollar for that /15?  




From: arin-ppml-bounces at arin.net [mailto:arin-ppml-bounces at arin.net] On
Behalf Of Owen DeLong
Sent: Sunday, May 29, 2011 10:46 PM
To: Brett Frankenberger
Cc: arin-ppml at arin.net
Subject: Re: [arin-ppml] ARIN-prop-153 Correct erroneous syntax in NRPM 8.3




What I would think makes more sense as policy would be:


Organizations may transfer multiple address blocks but

no organization shall receive more than one address block

per year where said address block is smaller

than its original registered size.




-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.arin.net/pipermail/arin-ppml/attachments/20110529/494124d5/attachment-0001.html>

More information about the ARIN-PPML mailing list