[arin-ppml] ARIN-prop-153 Correct erroneous syntax in NRPM 8.3

Blake Dunlap ikiris at gmail.com
Fri May 27 10:36:49 EDT 2011


To keep companies from gaming transfers with multiple discreet requests,
perhaps add a blackout period for transfers then after each transfer? While
I tend to disagree with the single aggregate clause itself, I do wish to see
the goals of the community met as desired.

-Blake

On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 09:33, Matthew Kaufman <matthew at matthew.at> wrote:

>
> On May 27, 2011, at 3:31 PM, ARIN wrote:
>
> > ARIN-prop-153 Correct erroneous syntax in NRPM 8.3
> >
>
> I am opposed to this policy. It directly contradicts my proposal to delete
> the single-aggregate requirement.
>
> Also, I have noted in that proposal that the single-aggregate transfer
> requirement as it would apply with this proposal in effect can be trivially
> worked around simply by submitting a large number of individual transfers,
> each of which comes with justification. This just increases the amount of
> paperwork for both parties *and* ARIN with no other benefit.
>
> (Even the Nortel-Microsoft paperwork filed with the court talks about
> multiple subsequent transfers, if needed, and how payment works in this
> case.)
>
> Matthew Kaufman
>
> _______________________________________________
> PPML
> You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
> the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML at arin.net).
> Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
> http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
> Please contact info at arin.net if you experience any issues.
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.arin.net/pipermail/arin-ppml/attachments/20110527/fcfd7e9f/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the ARIN-PPML mailing list