[arin-ppml] Integrating Draft Policy ARIN-2011-1 into NRPM 8.3
adudek16 at gmail.com
Thu May 26 15:45:33 EDT 2011
Since we are discussing 8.3.
I feel that there should be language to allow for transfers of IPv6.
Currently there is no language to allow for transfers of IPv6 allocations.
8.3. Transfers to Specified Recipients
In addition to transfers under section 8.2, IPv4 and IPv6 number resources
within the ARIN region may be released to ARIN by the authorized resource
holder, in whole or in part, for transfer to another specified
The other option would to remove the version number and just leave IP number
> On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 01:34, Owen DeLong <owen at delong.com> wrote:
>> On May 25, 2011, at 2:06 PM, Jeffrey Lyon wrote:
>> > On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 1:57 PM, Owen DeLong <owen at delong.com> wrote:
>> >> It doesn't surprise me to see that we will disagree on this.
>> >> Since you are opposed to needs-basis in general, I don't expect you to
>> >> understand
>> >> the need to preserve it here or to agree with it.
>> >> Owen
>> >> On May 25, 2011, at 9:21 AM, Mike Burns wrote:
>> > Similarly, I don't expect you to entertain any logic that free markets
>> > are beneficial. I suspect spending a lot of time in the Bay Area has
>> > that effect.
>> I think there are places where regulated free markets can be beneficial.
>> If you can point to a single historical example of an unregulated free
>> market that
>> remained beneficial and unregulated for more than 5 years, I'll be
>> You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
>> the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML at arin.net).
>> Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
>> Please contact info at arin.net if you experience any issues.
More information about the ARIN-PPML