[arin-ppml] Integrating Draft Policy ARIN-2011-1 into NRPM 8.3

Owen DeLong owen at delong.com
Mon May 23 17:05:11 EDT 2011


I could support this, but, I have a couple of lingering concerns.

I think that the last sentence dictates too much in the case of a transfer to another region and should only apply to transfers within the ARIN region. I would like to see us relocate the
single aggregate clause to make it binding on the actual community intent and if we're
going to turn 2011-1 into a policy to modify 8.3 anyway, we should incorporate that
change.

Owen


Sent from my iPad

On May 23, 2011, at 15:54, Scott Leibrand <scottleibrand at gmail.com> wrote:

> In light of the discomfort a number of community and AC members feel with the original 2011-1 text, I thought I'd make an attempt at integrating it into the framework of NRPM 8.3, to see if the result would be tighter and less ambiguous.  Here's what I came up with:
> 
> 8.3. Transfers to Specified Recipients
> 
> In addition to transfers under section 8.2, IPv4 number resources may be released to ARIN by the authorized resource holder, in whole or in part, for transfer:
> to a specified organizational recipient within the ARIN region, or 
> to another RIR, for transfer to a specified organizational recipient in that RIR's service region, if the two RIRs agree and maintain compatible, needs-based transfer policies.
> Such transferred number resources may only be received under RSA by organizations that can demonstrate the need for such resources, as a single aggregate, in the exact amount which they can justify under current ARIN policies.  
> 
> Thoughts?
> -Scott
> 
> 
> For reference, existing policy reads:
> 8.3. Transfers to Specified Recipients
> 
> In addition to transfers under section 8.2, IPv4 number resources within the ARIN region may be released to ARIN by the authorized resource holder, in whole or in part, for transfer to another specified organizational recipient. Such transferred number resources may only be received under RSA by organizations that are within the ARIN region and can demonstrate the need for such resources, as a single aggregate, in the exact amount which they can justify under current ARIN policies.
> 
> And original 2011-1 text reads:
> Any RIR's resource registrant may transfer IPv4 addresses to the resource registrant of another RIR as long as the two RIRs agree and maintain compatible, needs-based transfer policies that exercise Internet stewardship consistent with the values expressed in RFC2050.
> _______________________________________________
> PPML
> You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
> the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML at arin.net).
> Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
> http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
> Please contact info at arin.net if you experience any issues.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.arin.net/pipermail/arin-ppml/attachments/20110523/3d4c6325/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the ARIN-PPML mailing list