[arin-ppml] ARIN-prop-150 Reclamation Hold

George Herbert george.herbert at gmail.com
Mon May 16 19:59:55 EDT 2011

On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 4:37 PM, Matthew Kaufman <matthew at matthew.at> wrote:
> On May 13, 2011, at 7:50 AM, Martin Hannigan wrote:
> Agreed, we just had a proposal with significant support to return
> address reclaimed to the free pool with a high expectation of
> "faster", not slower. I don't see why this would be any different
> hence I expect a lack of community support. In fact, I think that the
> author should consider withdrawing this to save us all some time.
> I am withdrawing ARIN-prop-150.
> We need to leave this as an administrative decision influenced by the
> community vs. a rule. This is an example of not knowing what you might
> not  know.
> Agree that this should be handled via ASCP rather than as a policy change to
> the NRPM.
> I believe the discussion on the list has been enlightening in that some want
> a much shorter hold period, some want a much longer hold period, and almost
> nobody wants the hold period we currently have.
> Matthew Kaufman

Perhaps a clarifying document that splits the all theh discussed
categories out separately would be a timely response to the

However, I have No Time This Week, so I leave this to someone else to
write if it's seen to be valuable enough to pursue.

-george william herbert
george.herbert at gmail.com

More information about the ARIN-PPML mailing list