[arin-ppml] Draft Proposal 2011-1 - Comments request - Globally Coordinated Transfer Policy

Martin Hannigan hannigan at gmail.com
Fri May 13 15:00:31 EDT 2011

On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 2:59 PM, John Curran <jcurran at arin.net> wrote:
> On May 13, 2011, at 11:12 AM, Martin Hannigan wrote:
>> And just because you keep saying that it's not true doesn't mean that
>> it's not. There's ample evidence supporting my claim including
>> activity at the ICANN ASO AC and NRO NC to deprecate it. That kinda
>> sorta speaks pretty loudly. There has also been plenty of discussion
>> here with most agreeing that it's "outdated". Please, feel free to
>> demonstrate that it's relevant in some way.
> I've heard of discussions to deprecate it, as well as discussions to
> revise or replace it.  I do believe much more important to focus on
> determine which values in RFC 2050 (some, none, or all) are still
> valuable to the community, as opposed to having a reference to the
> RFC 2050 itself.

That's where I was going with "in the interest of the ARIN community".



More information about the ARIN-PPML mailing list