[arin-ppml] ARIN-prop-148 LRSA resources must not be transferred to LRSA

Owen DeLong owen at delong.com
Wed May 11 21:04:37 EDT 2011

On May 11, 2011, at 5:46 PM, William Herrin wrote:

> On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 8:03 PM, Jimmy Hess <mysidia at gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 12:29 PM, William Herrin <bill at herrin.us> wrote:
>>> This allows for John Curran's case where the RSA sees minor changes to
>>> accommodate government entities and the like.
>>> -Bill
>> If ARIN staff feels there are minor changes they should make to the
>> RSA, they should
>> make public record of those changes somewhere,  and explain when they
>> are used,
> I agree. John -- how about publishing the one-off modified RSAs and
> LRSAs that have been used and explaining in each case what change was
> made and why it was deemed appropriate? Making non-substantive
> adjustments doesn't inherently strike me as unreasonable, but the
> interests of transparency would be well served by making those
> adjustments public knowledge.
Agreed. This should be possible without identifying the particular
recipient of the modification, so, I don't believe it would violate
any NDA to do so.


More information about the ARIN-PPML mailing list