[arin-ppml] Draft Proposal for Needs-Free IPv4 Transfers

Owen DeLong owen at delong.com
Wed May 11 13:13:59 EDT 2011

On May 11, 2011, at 6:49 AM, John Curran wrote:

> On May 11, 2011, at 6:31 AM, Mike Burns wrote:
>>> RFC 2050 states: "IP addresses are valid as long as the criteria continues to be met."
>> I'm with Owen, in that this looks like an oversight and should be corrected in the NRPM if that's what the community wants.
> Agreed - the community should definitely make their intention known 
> on whether ARIN should consider the utilization of resources after 
> assignment or allocation.  We obviously have to consider such when
> processing a request for additional resources, but should it matter
> otherwise?
I believe that in the discussions and the authorship of section 12, that
was the clear intent of the community. Section 12 is a no-op otherwise.


More information about the ARIN-PPML mailing list