[arin-ppml] Draft Proposal for Needs-Free IPv4 Transfers
mysidia at gmail.com
Tue May 10 00:05:18 EDT 2011
On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 9:20 PM, Owen DeLong <owen at delong.com> wrote:
> RSA, I could support it. I do not support granting LRSA to transfer
> recipients. The LRSA provides special benefits that are intended to
I agree. The LRSA is an agreement between ARIN and a legacy resource holder.
A transfer recipient is not a legacy resource holder; a transfer
recipient is a new
Also, there is no reason ARIN should adopt a more lax policy in anticipation
that a resource holder will ignore their obligations in attempting to make
'undocumented' transfers not allowed by policy.
Legitimizing non-needs-based transfers would encourage them.
It is questionable whether black market transfers would even be
attempted, otherwise, by any legacy holders with significant number
resources assigned to their network.
More information about the ARIN-PPML