[arin-ppml] ARIN-prop-146 Clarify Justified Need for Transfers

George Herbert george.herbert at gmail.com
Thu May 5 20:26:12 EDT 2011

On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 4:57 PM, Owen DeLong <owen at delong.com> wrote:
>> There are many ways to demonstrate prior use history and good
>> stewardship of IP space that was not directly ARIN allocated that
>> COULD be considered by ARIN in an allocation request, for someone
>> who's new to the ARIN game but has been in existence long enough.
>> The current policy replaces COULD with NOT.  Fundamentally I think
>> COULD is a better (fairer to new entrants, at this time, under final
>> /8 conditions, not an automatic open gate for speculation beyond
>> current policy root goals etc).
> I would need to see the proposal details, but, I might be able to get
> behind a policy that did that. That is not what 146 does in its
> current form.

I think that's what 146 was intended to do and was how I read it, but
I can't read Matthew's mind.

Matthew - if that was the intent, are you open to alternate language
proposals that won't cause Owen to break out in hives?

-george william herbert
george.herbert at gmail.com

More information about the ARIN-PPML mailing list