[arin-ppml] Serious question for the list.
Daniel_Alexander at Cable.Comcast.com
Thu May 5 15:19:12 EDT 2011
Tenure on the list is irrelevant. It is the value of the comments that
carry weight. While I don't know how long he has subscribed to the list, I
think Leif Sawyer is a good example. I haven't seen many posts from him,
but he made a very relevant point in the discussion regarding prop-147. I
am confident few people thought about how the time requirements in policy
impacted his business, given a very limited construction season in Alaska.
On 5/5/11 2:44 PM, "Mike Burns" <mike at nationwideinc.com> wrote:
>> The AC does pay close attention to PPML and to our perceived will
>> of the community. Yes, our perceived will of the community is a
>> somewhat nebulous concept, but, I think that is unavoidable in
>> a consensus-based bottom-up process. However, if the community
>> expresses strong support for a direction contrary to the current
>> policy, that support would definitely be considered by the AC.
>Would the AC give more weight to expressions of support from long term
>members than from newcomers?
>You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
>the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML at arin.net).
>Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
>Please contact info at arin.net if you experience any issues.
More information about the ARIN-PPML