[arin-ppml] Fw: Accusation of fundamental, conflictofinterest/IPaddresspolicypitched directly to ICANN
mike at nationwideinc.com
Tue May 3 16:01:34 EDT 2011
Hi Eric, answers inline
> taking a few comments spread over a myrid of notes ...
>> My interest is in having a market for the buying and selling of IP
>> addresses free from government and psuedo-government ...
> a [IDEOLOGICAL] tag on the subject line would be appropriate.
I suppose I am guilty of having an ideology which guides me.
Am I the only one on the list?
>> ... a informed higher authority ...
> the existence of which is an assumption that is not actually proved.
Or disproved, so why not continue the discussion?
>> I think that is like expecting Network Solutions to have voted for
>> competing DNS registrars
> the expression of opinion, absent a reference to competition policy, in
> the late 90s, or the present, is not convincing, nor, in the example
> offered, correct.
I am assuming a historical perspective from the intelligent posters here,
perhaps a remedial lesson is required in some cases.
>> But nobody seems too sure what that higher authority is ...
> i hadn't observed a question asked, only an assertion that an answer
> existed, in a specific form.
More information about the ARIN-PPML