[arin-ppml] Statistics regarding NRPM 8.3 Transfers to date
frnkblk at iname.com
Mon May 2 23:21:47 EDT 2011
On one hand I would prefer an STLS that doesn't allow transferred netblocks
to be de-aggregated, either at the time of transfer or in the future. On
the other, creating that restriction will give incentive for sellers and
buyers to work around ARIN as much as they possibly can.
From: arin-ppml-bounces at arin.net [mailto:arin-ppml-bounces at arin.net] On
Behalf Of Matthew Kaufman
Sent: Sunday, May 01, 2011 4:25 PM
To: Stephen Sprunk
Cc: arin-ppml at arin.net
Subject: Re: [arin-ppml] Statistics regarding NRPM 8.3 Transfers to date
On 5/1/2011 10:44 AM, Stephen Sprunk wrote:
> However, assuming that aggregation has inherent value to
> buyers, sellers will avoid them out of self-interest, so we may not need
> to put anything into policy. Is anyone seriously concerned that
> assumption is wrong?
That's exactly why I don't think we need really complicated language
that then has lots of associated loopholes.
If aggregation is good, providers will encourage it, and addresses that
are big aggregates will have more value. Done.
You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML at arin.net).
Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
Please contact info at arin.net if you experience any issues.
More information about the ARIN-PPML