[arin-ppml] Accusation of fundamental conflict ofinterest/IPaddresspolicy pitched directly to ICANN
owen at delong.com
Mon May 2 18:11:02 EDT 2011
They did not sell the addresses.
They sold the registration of and the right to use the addresses in a particular manner.
On May 2, 2011, at 12:09 PM, Mike Burns wrote:
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Ray Hunter
> To: Mike Burns
> Cc: arin-ppml at arin.net
> Sent: Monday, May 02, 2011 2:53 PM
> Subject: Re: [arin-ppml] Accusation of fundamental conflict ofinterest/IPaddresspolicy pitched directly to ICANN
> No one owns the addresses today. They're just 32 bit numbers. That's all. Nothing more. Nothing less. No one ever owned the addresses. They have zero intrinsic value.
> That train has left the station. Nortel sold addresses to Microsoft for $7.5 million.
> Addresses which have been allocated very obviously have a value different from a random string of 32 bit numbers.
> You can argue that they shouldn't, you can argue that correct stewardship would be to establish policies to kill IPv4 and thus transition more swiftly.
> But you can't argue that they have zero value.
> You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
> the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML at arin.net).
> Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
> Please contact info at arin.net if you experience any issues.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the ARIN-PPML