[arin-ppml] ARIN-2011-2 (Was: Forcing POCs and other contacts to act through a "blacklist")
jcurran at arin.net
Sun May 1 02:19:46 EDT 2011
On May 1, 2011, at 6:05 AM, Ronald F. Guilmette wrote:
> curran> "Legacy resources that have been abandoned because a company, for
> curran> example, has dissolved don't really pose a problem."
> John Curran knows good and well that there is a problem. He has simply
> been doing his level best to steer himself and his minions well and
> truly clear of taking any responsiblity for fixing it, or even in-
> vestigating it.
Leo seems to have pulled one sentence from the middle of
my remarks; here's the full statement in context from the
"Legacy resources that have been abandoned because a company, for example, has dissolved don't really pose a problem. Misuse of legacy resources could be problematic, could take more resources than handling other cases. And, again, we need to know is there a prioritization here that the community would apply if we adopt this policy."
I meant exactly what I said, which is that ARIN doesn't have
difficulties cleaning up resources which are truly abandoned...
it's fairly simple to do so once we receive a report and can
determine the address holder is defunct. I was not speaking of
resources of a defunct organization which are in active use
and likely being misused; those can indeed be problem *which
is precisely as I said in my remarks*
We're absolutely willing to put more resources on these types
of abuse, but need to understand which targets and what level
of resources the members want us to invest here.
President and CEO
More information about the ARIN-PPML