[arin-ppml] Draft Proposal 2011-1 - Comments request - Globally Coordinated Transfer Policy

[Chris Grundemann]

On Sat, May 14, 2011 at 06:54, Jeffrey Lyon <jeffrey.lyon at blacklotus.net> wrote:

> My position is that the elected officials of ARIN are accountable to
> ARIN region and should only be concerned with securing resources for
> use within ARIN.

As an elected member of the ARIN Advisory Council, I feel compelled to
state that while I see myself as accountable directly to the ARIN
region (as you state); I completely disagree that means "securing
resources for use within ARIN" exclusively and in all cases,
particularly when it could/would cause harm to the Internet ecosystem
at large.

I believe that Internet stability is of utmost importance to everyone
I am accountable to and that it is a higher goal than securing IPv4
addresses for them individually (the greater-good vs. individual-need
is how I see it). Please feel free not to vote for me the next time
around if you disagree.

> As a practical matter, every region is going to have need far beyond
> supply but I am not comfortable with any policy which would open the
> door to a decision that somehow another region's need is more
> important.

Agreed. We should not put any region's need above that of another.

Cheers,
~Chris


> --
> Jeffrey Lyon, Leadership Team
> jeffrey.lyon at blacklotus.net | http://www.blacklotus.net
> Black Lotus Communications - AS32421
> First and Leading in DDoS Protection Solutions
> _______________________________________________
> PPML
> You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
> the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML at arin.net).
> Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
> http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
> Please contact info at arin.net if you experience any issues.
>



-- 
@ChrisGrundemann
weblog.chrisgrundemann.com
www.burningwiththebush.com
www.theIPv6experts.net
www.coisoc.org