[arin-ppml] transfer conditions
mysidia at gmail.com
Sun May 8 13:48:49 EDT 2011
On Sat, May 7, 2011 at 11:04 PM, Matthew Kaufman <matthew at matthew.at> wrote:
> Why don't we just start by disallowing all transfers smaller than, say, /19... and then adjusting that downward (in block size... upward in mask length) as the market shows that it can't function with the simultaneous combination of needs-justification-requirements and minimum-block/aggregate-sizes?
Why don't we start by disallowing all transfers smaller than the
minimum allocation size for the block?
And use /22 as the minimum allocation size for any legacy block of
which /16s were assigned'
/20 as the minimum allocation size for any legacy block of size /8 or
shorter were assigned?
ARIN allocates prefixes longer than /19, so /19 restriction seems a bit much
More information about the ARIN-PPML