[arin-ppml] Statistics regarding NRPM 8.3 Transfers to date

[Owen DeLong]

On May 1, 2011, at 2:25 PM, Matthew Kaufman wrote:

> On 5/1/2011 10:44 AM, Stephen Sprunk wrote:
>> However, assuming that aggregation has inherent value to
>> buyers, sellers will avoid them out of self-interest, so we may not need
>> to put anything into policy.  Is anyone seriously concerned that
>> assumption is wrong?
> 
> That's exactly why I don't think we need really complicated language that then has lots of associated loopholes.
> 
> If aggregation is good, providers will encourage it, and addresses that are big aggregates will have more value. Done.
> 
> Matthew Kaufman

I find your faith in a market leading to people doing the right thing...

	[x]	distressing
	[x]	amusing
	[x]	questionable
	[ ]	enlightened
	[ ]	likely
	[ ]	probable

	(check all that apply)

Owen