jcurran at arin.net
Mon May 2 15:57:37 EDT 2011
On May 2, 2011, at 9:33 PM, William Herrin wrote:
> On Mon, May 2, 2011 at 3:24 PM, Owen DeLong <owen at delong.com> wrote:
>> On Apr 30, 2011, at 5:39 PM, William Herrin wrote:
>>> I will suggest that an attempt by ARIN to charge $100/year under a
>>> contract simplified to, "We agree to keep your whois data and RDNS
>>> delegations intact as is for one year increments until either of us
>>> choose to cancel this contract" would meet with at most mild
>>> resistance from the legacy registrants. It would also, IMHO, provide
>>> an excellent way to weed out the abandoned registrations.
>> That seems like a reasonable summary of the current LRSA.
> If counsel agrees with that assessment (he doesn't and you didn't
> check) then start summarizing and put the result in front of me,
> without all the excess baggage in the current LRSA.
That additional language in the LRSA comes from the RSA (which
is what everyone else has agreed to to receive registry services)
If you have a suggestion for revising the RSA or LRSA, you can
send it directly to me or submit it via the ARIN Consultation
and Suggestion process. Revisions to these agreements have
resulted from past suggestions.
President and CEO
More information about the ARIN-PPML