[arin-ppml] ARIN-prop-138 IPv6 Size Category Alignment

[Owen DeLong]

This is not a policy topic, IMHO, and is already the subject of a
request to the BoT in the ACSP which should receive attention
well before the October PPM.

Owen

On Mar 14, 2011, at 2:18 PM, ARIN wrote:

> ARIN-prop-138 IPv6 Size Category Alignment
> 
> ARIN received the following policy proposal and is posting it to the
> Public Policy Mailing List (PPML) in accordance with the Policy
> Development Process.
> 
> The ARIN Advisory Council (AC) will review the proposal at their next
> regularly scheduled meeting (if the period before the next regularly
> scheduled meeting is less than 10 days, then the period may be extended
> to the subsequent regularly scheduled meeting). The AC will decide how
> to utilize the proposal and announce the decision to the PPML.
> 
> The AC invites everyone to comment on the proposal on the PPML,
> particularly their support or non-support and the reasoning
> behind their opinion. Such participation contributes to a thorough
> vetting and provides important guidance to the AC in their deliberations.
> 
> Draft Policies and Proposals under discussion can be found at:
> https://www.arin.net/policy/proposals/index.html
> 
> The ARIN Policy Development Process can be found at:
> https://www.arin.net/policy/pdp.html
> 
> Mailing list subscription information can be found
> at: https://www.arin.net/mailing_lists/
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Communications and Member Services
> American Registry for Internet Numbers (ARIN)
> 
> 
> ## * ##
> 
> 
> ARIN-prop-138 IPv6 Size Category Alignment
> 
> Proposal Originator: Charles Gucker
> 
> Proposal Version: 1.0
> 
> Date: 14 March 2011
> 
> Proposal type: modify
> 
> Policy term: permanent
> 
> Policy statement:
> 
> For IPv6 ISP Classification, the "Size Category" shall be determined
> based on the following schedule:
> 
> X-small    /32 or smaller
> Small      /31 to /30
> Medium     /29 to /27
> Large      /26 to /24
> X-large    /23 to /20
> XX-large          /20 and larger
> 
> Rationale:
> 
> Since the adoption of ARIN Policy 2001-4 and the introduction of the
> IPv6 fee schedule there has existed a discontinuity between the fee
> schedule and the policy language.   As the policy is written,
> "6.5.1.1. Initial allocation size Organizations that meet at least one
> of the following criteria are eligible to receive a minimum allocation
> of /32. …",  However, the fee schedule currently states that an ISP
> within the X-Small category be allocated "smaller than /40" and the
> Small category of "/40 to /32".   As a result, with current policy an
> existing ISP within the X-Small category, when requesting the minimum
> IPv6 allocation, would have to jump Size categories to receive their
> IPv6 Allocation.  With the IANA IPv4 runout behind us, it is important
> to eliminate all hurdles for existing Organizations to receive IPv6
> allocations, even the X-Small.   This proposal is intended to do just
> that by aligning the Size Category with current policy.
> 
> Timetable for implementation: immediate
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> PPML
> You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
> the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML at arin.net).
> Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
> http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
> Please contact info at arin.net if you experience any issues.