[arin-ppml] OAM v MPLS

Rudolph Daniel rudi.daniel at gmail.com
Thu Mar 10 12:13:19 EST 2011


>
> I am trying to understand the significance of the ITU's decision to promote
> OAM as opposed to the IETF's MPLS as a networking standard.
>
Any comments

RD


------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2011 09:26:23 -0600
> From: David Farmer <farmer at umn.edu>
> To: George Herbert <george.herbert at gmail.com>
> Cc: arin-ppml at arin.net
> Subject: Re: [arin-ppml] ARIN-prop-137 Global Policy for post
>        exhaustion IPv4 allocation mechanisms by the IANA
> Message-ID: <4D78ED9F.3040701 at umn.edu>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
>
> On 3/8/11 23:21 CST, George Herbert wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 11:46 AM, ARIN<info at arin.net>  wrote:
> >> [...]
> >> ARIN-prop-137 Global Policy for post exhaustion IPv4 allocation
> >> mechanisms by the IANA
> >>
> >> Proposal Originator: Philip Smith
> >>    co-authors: Alejandro Acosta, Nicolas Antoniello, S. Moonesamy,
> >>         Douglas Onyango, Medel Ramirez, Masato Yamanishi
> >
> >
> > Philip and others -
> >
> > Can you explain your rationale and reasoning behind this proposal?
>
> I won't speak for the authors, but this proposed global policy is known
> as APNIC-Prop-097 in the APNIC region and was discussed at the APNIC
> meeting two weeks ago in Hong Kong, and on the APNIC sig-policy mailing
> list.  APNIC-Prop-097 was the second policy presented in the 4th session
> of APNIC's Policy SIG, on Thursday, Feb 24.  It was proceeded by the
> presentation of APNIC-Prop-086 which is equilivant to ARIN-2010-10,
> which is an alternate proposal for dealing with many of the same issues.
>  Once both proposals were presented, then a joint discussion of the two
> proposals followed.
>
> A link to the transcript from the 4th Policy SIG session;
> http://meetings.apnic.net/31/policy/transcript#session4
>
> A link to the Audio from the 4th Policy SIG session;
> http://podcast.apnic.net/meetings/31/policy-sig-sess4.mp3
>
> A link to the Video from the 4th Policy SIG session;
> http://streaming.apnic.net/meetings/31/policy-sig-sess4-hinted.mov
>
> Further, the APNIC sig-policy mailing list archives can be found at;
> http://mailman.apnic.net/mailing-lists/sig-policy/index.shtml
>
> > Also, please address how a valid IANA policy would be appropriately
> > created by an ARIN policy process... ?
>
> As has been stated, Global Policies are how IANA policies are created
> and all Global Policies must go through each of the five RIR policy
> processes.
>
> See the following for details;
> http://www.nro.net/documents/global-policy-development-process
>
> I hope that helps;
>
> --
> ===============================================
> David Farmer               Email:farmer at umn.edu
> Networking & Telecommunication Services
> Office of Information Technology
> University of Minnesota
> 2218 University Ave SE      Phone: 612-626-0815
> Minneapolis, MN 55414-3029   Cell: 612-812-9952
> ===============================================
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2011 10:28:44 -0500
> From: ARIN <info at arin.net>
> To: arin-ppml at arin.net
> Subject: [arin-ppml] Draft Policy ARIN-2011-6: Returned IPv4 Addresses
>        -       revised
> Message-ID: <4D78EE2C.3050501 at arin.net>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
>
> Draft Policy ARIN-2011-6
> Returned IPv4 Addresses
>
> ARIN-2011-6 has been revised. This draft policy is open for discussion
> on this mailing list and will be on the agenda at the upcoming ARIN
> Public Policy Meeting in San Juan.
>
> ARIN-2011-6 is below and can be found at:
> https://www.arin.net/policy/proposals/2011_6.html
>
> Regards,
>
> Communications and Member Services
> American Registry for Internet Numbers (ARIN)
>
>
> ## * ##
>
>
> Draft Policy ARIN-2011-6
> Returned IPv4 Addresses
>
> Date: 10 March 2011
>
> Policy statement:
>
> 4.1.9 Returned IPv4 Addresses
>
> Except where otherwise directed by policy; all IPv4 addresses returned
> to, recovered, or revoked by ARIN will be made available for allocation
> or assignment in the ARIN region as quickly as practicable.
>
> Rationale:
>
> Adopting this proposal will result in the clarification of the status of
> returned IPv4 addresses. IPv4 address resources should not sit idle due
> to lack of policy clarity.
>
> Timetable for implementation: Immediately
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> ARIN-PPML mailing list
> ARIN-PPML at arin.net
> http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
>
> End of ARIN-PPML Digest, Vol 69, Issue 5
> ****************************************
>



-- 

Rudi Daniel
*danielcharles consulting<http://www.facebook.com/pages/Kingstown-Saint-Vincent-and-the-Grenadines/DanielCharles/153611257984774>
**1-784 498 8277<http://www.facebook.com/pages/Kingstown-Saint-Vincent-and-the-Grenadines/DanielCharles/153611257984774>
*
*
*
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.arin.net/pipermail/arin-ppml/attachments/20110310/36104880/attachment.html>


More information about the ARIN-PPML mailing list