[arin-ppml] Draft Policy 2011-1 - Inter-RIR Transfers - Shepherd's Inquiry
BillD at cait.wustl.edu
Wed Jun 22 12:27:54 EDT 2011
As you know I have proposed alternate language that tries to incorporate
some things and eliminate others that are controversial. I have done
this because I sense that stalemate still exists on the current DP and
while I absolutely support and encourage Owen in his interest for
bringing it to another vote, I don't see it being sent to last call. My
effort is parallel and aimed at Philly.
I welcome your new ideas on what I believe is the chief obstacle of
needs-based policy in recipient RIRs. Personally and for the
record...all this is still deck chairs for me. I think that even in the
short to intermediate term this wrangling only affects the Internet
Few will recall, but I openly advocated for accepting 2009-3 in its
original format as I believed it was insignificant in consequence and
not doing so had many undesirous effects.
So, again, I welcome the discussion of the pros and cons of the whole
issue top to bottom.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: arin-ppml-bounces at arin.net
> [mailto:arin-ppml-bounces at arin.net] On Behalf Of Scott Leibrand
> Sent: Wednesday, June 22, 2011 10:42 AM
> To: Martin Hannigan
> Cc: arin ppml; Robert E. Seastrom
> Subject: Re: [arin-ppml] Draft Policy 2011-1 - Inter-RIR
> Transfers - Shepherd's Inquiry
> As much as I support inter-RIR transfers, and agree with
> Chris that we had strong support for this at San Juan, I
> think Marty is right that opinion on PPML is much more
> divided. I personally think that is because of the moderating
> and pragmaticizing influence of in-person discussion, not
> because overall sentiment has changed. But regardless, I
> won't oppose sending it for another round of discussion in Philly.
> After Thursday, I also plan to float some other ideas (which
> we've discussed here on the AC list) on PPML for inter-RIR
> transfer policy that avoids the requirement for needs-based
> local transfer policy at the receiving RIR. I think that will
> be necessary to actually allow any inter-RIR transfers to
> APNIC. Since the current proposals are no-ops unless APNIC
> changes their transfer policy in Busan, I'm ok waiting to
> discuss them at Philly as well.
> On Jun 22, 2011, at 8:30 AM, Martin Hannigan
> <hannigan at gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 11:21 AM, Chris Grundemann
> > <cgrundemann at gmail.com> wrote:
> >> On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 15:08, Martin Hannigan
> <hannigan at gmail.com> wrote:
> >>> I guess I'm not clear on what the consensus looks like at
> this point
> >>> since I'm under the impression that there is a
> significant lack of
> >>> support community wise.
> >> From the straw poll at the PPM in San Juan (116 in the room):
> >> 1) 2011-1 as written? 18 in favor, 11 against
> >> 2) The principle of creating an inter-RIR transfer policy? 41 in
> >> favor, 1 against
> >> 3) The principle of a needs-based inter-RIR transfer policy? 36 in
> >> favor, 2 against
> >> I believe that is exactly what rough consensus looks like. I am
> >> forced to characterize that as a _significant *show* of
> support_ and
> >> denounce your claim to the contrary.
> >>> But fair enough. Considering the lack of support overall
> though, I'd
> >>> strongly suggest abandonment as a serious issue for continued AC
> >>> discussion.
> >> Repeating a falsehood does not make it so. The community
> as a whole
> >> has very clearly asked us to work on this policy.
> > With the current commentary in the thread offers a much different
> > picture. If you're saying that today and commenting on this
> > now we have consensus. you are incorrect.
> > Best,
> > -M<
> > _______________________________________________
> > PPML
> > You are receiving this message because you are subscribed
> to the ARIN
> > Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML at arin.net).
> > Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
> > http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
> > Please contact info at arin.net if you experience any issues.
> You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
> the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML at arin.net).
> Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
> Please contact info at arin.net if you experience any issues.
More information about the ARIN-PPML