[arin-ppml] Draft Policy 2011-5: Shared Transition Space for IPv4 Address Extension - IAB comment

[Joe Maimon]

Owen DeLong wrote:
> On Jun 29, 2011, at 5:53 AM, Joe Maimon wrote:
>    
>> Precisely. Expect organizations who have had sufficient positive results with their NAT444 deployments to not limit it to new users only, for many reasons, some of which they cannot be faulted for.
>>
>>      
> Why? And what about all the other organizations that have had sufficient negative results?
>    

I cant see how the solution can be usable for new customers but not for 
old. Either it works for both or it works for neither.

>> Some of these organizations will as a result have more available resources then anybody else put together.
>>
>>      
> This is relevant how?
>
>    

A reality in where the vast majority of available ipv4 resources are 
held by a group of entities other than RiRs should have some relevancy 
somewhere in policy discussions, perhaps along with policies that help 
to further those odds.


Joe