[arin-ppml] Proposition 153 -- Correct erroneous syntax in NRPM 8.3

[Matthew Kaufman]

On 6/18/2011 4:55 PM, Owen DeLong wrote:
> Under current staff interpretation, the clause is bound to the justification rather than
> the resources transferred. The clear and obvious intent of the language is that it
> be bound to the resources transferred and not the justification. As such, this proposal
> seeks to achieve that end.

Opposed. Just requires lots of serial transfers for no particularly good 
reason, impedes the market for those with legitimate need.

> Yes, this is in direct opposition to proposal 144 which seeks to remove the single
> aggregate clause altogether.

And I'm opposed to 153 no matter how 144 goes.

Matthew Kaufman