[arin-ppml] ARIN-prop-128: Replacement of Section

Martin Hannigan hannigan at gmail.com
Thu Jan 27 11:42:34 EST 2011

On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 10:11 AM, Lee Howard <spiffnolee at yahoo.com> wrote:
> ----- Original Message ----
>> From: "Hannigan, Martin" <marty at akamai.com>
>> There are many reasons why an  application may be in suspense at the time of
>> the reduction, including ARIN  dawdling on responding, a surprise audit that
>> would complete successfully if  the application were in an accepted stage,
>> etc.
> ARIN dawdling?  If this proposal passes, it will slow processing of applications
> by encouraging a flood of them.  Makes the problem worse, not better.

Hard to measure without some performance statistics to be honest.

[ clip ]

> b.  Surely ARIN should not stop fraud investigations because runout is
> imminent?

Definitely not.

> c.  If you want ARIN not to start any resource reviews "at any other time"
> between now and IANA runout, I would understand.

No, but I want an applicant to not be truncated if they are in the
middle of a resource review and at the end of it they are validated to
be in compliance with policy. They should receive their request in
full based on policy in effect at the time that they made their

[ clip ]



More information about the ARIN-PPML mailing list