[arin-ppml] ARIN-prop-127: Shared Transition Space for IPv4Address Extension

Owen DeLong owen at delong.com
Fri Jan 21 22:18:20 EST 2011

On Jan 21, 2011, at 5:54 PM, Jack Bates wrote:

> On 1/21/2011 5:13 PM, Owen DeLong wrote:
>> What people mean when they say NAT444 is
>> cust<->NAT (Ctl by Cust)<->ProviderNet<->NAT (ctl by Provider)<->NAT (Ctl by CP)<->  Content
> When some of my telco's ran NAT, the breakage was considered a "feature" (early days of p2p broke hard).
Why would you consider breaking p2p a feature?


More information about the ARIN-PPML mailing list