[arin-ppml] ARIN-prop-129: IPv4 Addresses for Process Participants

Jimmy Hess mysidia at gmail.com
Fri Jan 21 15:38:38 EST 2011

On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 2:23 PM, ARIN <info at arin.net> wrote:

I object to PP129 assigning IP address space  based on response order
to a policy proposal.
The proposal does not consider need.  The definition of 'active
participant' is kind of bad.
Criteria for assignment is capricious and arbitrary,  and  creates
issues for anyone wanting to
support the proposal, as  claims of support or opposition can be
described as self-serving.

Good stewardship does not generally imply taking measures to
accelerate consumption of IPv4 space.
ARIN's role is not to impose IPv6 at all costs.


More information about the ARIN-PPML mailing list