[arin-ppml] ARIN-prop-127: Shared Transition Space for IPv4 Address Extension

Matthew Kaufman matthew at matthew.at
Thu Jan 20 12:00:38 EST 2011

On 1/20/2011 8:56 AM, Aaron Hughes wrote:
> While I hate the concept of NAT44, I completely understand there is no unique RFC1918 space not used in homes and therefore a new allocation must be available for transition. This should be used, IMHO, globally for NAT44 only. I support this proposal.

Reserving ARIN space for the purpose is not appropriate for "globally" 
as you suggest.

Matthew Kaufman

More information about the ARIN-PPML mailing list