[arin-ppml] ARIN-prop-126: Compliance Requirement

Leo Bicknell bicknell at ufp.org
Tue Jan 11 11:45:53 EST 2011

In a message written on Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 08:39:14AM -0800, Scott Leibrand wrote:
> I don't think this changes that: current policy already allows
> it (for orgs materially out of compliance, which would mean more
> like <50% than <80%).

Your response made me realize that I glossed-over the vague nature
of "materially".  I suspect if we asked the room what qualified
answers would range from 1% utilization to 79% utilization (in my
overly simplified example).

In retrospect my desire for a low water mark is equal parts of
wanting to avoid thrashing, but also wanting folks to have a specific
target so they can plan and evaluate their own network.  We don't
need ARIN staff and a resource holder to get in an argument over
the definition of a vague word like materially.

       Leo Bicknell - bicknell at ufp.org - CCIE 3440
        PGP keys at http://www.ufp.org/~bicknell/
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 826 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.arin.net/pipermail/arin-ppml/attachments/20110111/bb88100d/attachment-0001.sig>

More information about the ARIN-PPML mailing list