[arin-ppml] Alternative to proposal 125: Requiring IPv6 planning for IPv4 allocations

Jack Bates jbates at brightok.net
Mon Jan 10 18:48:54 EST 2011

On 1/10/2011 5:45 PM, Martin Hannigan wrote:
> Not one of those bullet points with respect to intent said anything
> about enforcement or requirements. I asked you to suggest an
> improvement and you're still rehashing version 1.

Show me a different proposal which doesn't have deployment requirements, 
and I'll look at it.


More information about the ARIN-PPML mailing list