[arin-ppml] ARIN-prop-131: Section 5.0 Legacy Addresses
owen at delong.com
Mon Jan 31 18:11:49 EST 2011
On Jan 31, 2011, at 2:31 PM, Martin Hannigan wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 2:06 PM, Chris Grundemann <cgrundemann at gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 10:02, cja at daydream.com <packetgrrl at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> I think it should say "made available for allocation or assignment"
> [ clip ]
>> Also, I am still confused as to why this policy is limited to legacy
>> resources specifically?
> If someone wants to articulate the problem with this proposal the way
> it is, (aside from the language that Bill and Chris commented on, I'd
> be happy to consider it.
Is it intentional to apply the policy to all returned resources or only
to resources that were not originally issued by ARIN?
If the former, then, the current language does not accomplish your
More information about the ARIN-PPML